Trying to find math inside everything else

Posts tagged ‘quadrilaterals’

Anagrams and Quads

In geometry we’re learning about the correspondence of congruence statements (i.e. ∆ABC ≅ ∆DEF means that A maps to D, BC = EF, angle CAB ≅ angle FDE, etc). One fun type of problem you can do with this is a self-referential congruence statement to highlight symmetry. For example, if LIMA ≅ MALI, what type of quadrilateral is it?

So the first question I had was “How many of these types of problems can you have?” The answer is not just the same as how many ways there are to arrange 4 letters (4!), because you still need to connect the four points in the same order (although you can change whether you go clockwise or counterclockwise). So if our starting ordering is 1234, you can have the following orderings:

1234IdentityOPTS
2143Isosceles TrapezoidPOST
2341SquarePTSO
3412ParallelogramTSOP
4123SquareSOPT
1432KiteOSTP
4321Isosceles TrapezoidSTPO
3214KiteTPOS

(As a side note, how do you solve these problems? You can list out all the sub-congruencies and mark up a diagram. But I like to think of the mapping of points and determine what transformation that would be. For example, with OPTS to POST, P and O switch places, and S and T switch places, so it must be a reflection with the line of reflection down the middle of lines PO and ST. This makes an isosceles trapezoid.)

I picked OPTS as a starting point because it’s the four-letter work with the most anagrams (OPTS, STOP, SPOT, POST, POTS) so I figured some would should up in this work and was surprised there was only one. But then I realized that which one I start with matters: if I start with OPTS, only POST is a valid shape, but if I start with STOP, then SPOT and POTS are valid.

So then I went through a list of four letter anagrams to find more that fit the patterns I need above. Below is a non-comprehensive list you can use for these types of problems if you, like me, like using words instead of just ABCD.

2143MANEAMEN
2143ACTSCAST
2143TIMEITEM
2143SUREUSER
2341EMITMITE
2341MITEITEM
2341EACHACHE
2341ABETBETA
3412MALILIMA
3412EMITITEM
3412ARTSTSAR
3412REPOPORE
3412CODEDECO
3412DEMOMODE
3412GOERERGO
4123ALESSALE
4123LOTSSLOT
4123OPENNOPE
1432BETABATE
1432DEMODOME
1432MATEMETA
1432GORYGYRO
4321ABUTTUBA
4321TIMEEMIT
4321RATSSTAR
4321BARDDRAB
3214AGEDEGAD
3214TIMEMITE
3214RATSTARS
3214MANENAME

If you have more anagram suggestions, leave them in the comments!

Quadrilateral Congruence

Stressful as it is, I am loving teaching new courses. When I first start teaching, I felt like I was learning new stuff all the time, stuff about algebra (and how it connects to other courses) that I didn’t know I didn’t know, and now it keeps happening with geometry, especially with the more transformational tinge CC geometry has.

One of the things that struck me was, last week, when I used this Illustrative Mathematics task as a follow-up to my lesson about the diagonals of quadrilaterals. I feel like the understanding I had internalized that you can prove triangles congruent with less information because they are rigid structures, but quadrilaterals are not, so there are no quadrilateral congruence theorems. But I realized that’s not true.

Last time, we constructed all of the special quadrilaterals by taking a triangle and applying a rigid motion transformation. That meant that every special quadrilateral can be split into two congruent triangles. Therefore, if you had enough information to prove one pair of triangles is congruent, you could prove the whole quadrilaterals are congruent.

Parallelogram SSSS

So if we’re looking at SSSS in terms of the triangles, we really only know two sides of the triangles. Since that’s not information to prove the triangles congruent, then it’s not enough for the parallelograms. But SAS is enough for the triangles, so it’s enough for the parallelograms.

Isosceles Trapezoid SSA

Here’s a non-parallelogram example. Here are two isosceles trapezoids with the same diagonals, same legs, and the same angle between the diagonals and one of the bases, but the trapezoids are not congruent. But that’s because, when you look at the triangles, we have Angle-Side-Side, which we all know is not a congruence theorem. If, instead, we had had SSS (a leg, a base, and a diagonal), then they would be congruent.